Reminded of this work of satire responding to the weak “how I got Iraq wrong” mea culpas by pundits who kept their positions of prominance despite being wrong about the easiest of easy calls.
The following appeared this week in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Slate and The New Yorker in a parallel universe …
How I Got It Right: Looking Back at a Time of Justified Opposition to a Mad, Violent Enterprise
So many publications have expressed such overwhelming interest in the perspectives of those of us who opposed the Iraq War when it had a chance of doing good that I have had to permit mutliple publication of this article in most of the nation’s elite media venues – collecting, I am almost embarrassed to admit, a separate fee from each. Everyone recognizes that the opinions of those of us who were right about Iraq then are crucial to formulating sane, just policy now. It’s a lot of pressure, so please forgive anything glib or short you read herein: between articles, interviews, think-tank panels and presentations before government agencies and policy organs I’m not permitted to mention, I’m a little frazzled.
On the bright side, and I can confirm that my experience has been similar to those of my fellow prophets, being the object of so much attention, being repeatedly quizzed by eager interlocutors on the same basic points, encourages one to distill one’s thinking to its essence. As Kenneth Pollack asked me the other day, “What the fuck was so special about you, anyway?”
No comments:
Post a Comment